*Corruption and lack of transparency-Lord Ali and the forty thieves
*Ineffective institutions-Courts, police, public institutions become unreliable and inaccessible-white hard working people jailed, non-white criminals freed
*Economic mismanagement-chronic budget deficit -£152 Billion for the current year, reliance on unsustainable debt with spiralling inflation up to 3.6%
*Erosion of rule of law-laws selectively applied and dissent suppressed by censorship and police state tactics
*Political instability-contested elections as in May 1st with 10 Councils captured by Reform
*Declining public services Infrastructure crumbling, NHS failing and education
standards being destroyed by Phillips. Power supply in danger of meltdown due to Net zero bollocks
*Loss of public trust-less than a third of people trust the government according to latest poll
*Human Rights abuses-crack down on free speech
*Brain drain and social decay-Billionaires and skilled people going, unskilled culturally backward people replacing leading to social cohesion fraying and crime and ethnic tensions rising.
And that’s the thing. For a so-called barrister, Starmer can’t even deliver a decent speech. Has to read everything and even then he makes it sound like he’s reading his Asda shopping list (including sausages).
Starmer's belief system was forged in the crucible of North London dinner parties. He's a zealot for that upper-middle-class, white-guilt-ridden, defeat-welcoming, left-liberal worldview. We, the people, don't count. Not at all. I'd say he despises us: our values, culture and history. His every decision proves it.
All true, but I still think additional pressure has been applied. The Chagos deal was on hold two weeks ago, but then suddenly got signed with great urgency.
Shortly after Starmer was elected, I concluded the guy's only intention was to utterly destroy Britain, deliberately appointing quarterwits like Lammy, and halfwits like wots-'er-name, that chick who worked for the bank. Wind 'em up, and let 'em go.
The only thing that concerns him is that he might be booted before he manages to do terminal damage - hence the comforting blah, blah about immigration and an island of strangers. An island of strangers is exactly what he intends.
I am really really hoping this is the fall of Rome moment. Treacherous doesn’t come close. If he doesn’t go soon I am gonna seriously think about claiming asylum in the US- until it is safe to return here😳. Anyone notice how ‘inconvenient’ truths disappear from MSM.
Anyone know how many have arrived from war torn France today? I heard they were refuse collectors back in France, before being driven to the coast and told Birmingham needs you🤔
People say the country is failing- but not everywhere I am really amazed too, how quick the police arrested AND charged some lad after they tried to assassinate our PM. Amazing efficiency.
Why worry - All is well. Think I’ll have a Chinese tonight- they are really good at long game cooking😉
Indeed! However, I'm not sure Starmer "hates Britain" because that's just too easy isn't it? Possibly he is just really stupid and naive and thinks he is getting good deals because nobody he listens to tells him they are crap deals. It seems to me that the whole of the western world is being run by pretty stupid, naive and uneducated people and Starmer is merely one of the worst. At least some of the others are better at bullying each other into submission - Starmer seems to be the one it's easiest to bully. He is clearly not very intelligent and lacks both imagination and compassion. This makes him dangerous for the UK but would "our Ange" or "Mad Milliband" or "Rachel from Accounts" be any better? Was Boris Johnson or Richi Sunak any better? Is Chancellor Merz better than any German alternative or is there a better version of President Macron? They are all weak people who have, due to a lack of interest from strong people, crawled to the top of the political pile. We are clearly due the arrival of the strong men to return some order to the world!
Bureaucrats are completely unable to create anything, but they are able to punish those who don’t comply with their rules and regulations, and that’s what he’s doing deliberately and on behalf of the establishment.
Definitely, not necessarily for another government but the incompetent traitor has sold his soul to devil as they once said, turned his back on christianity for whatever falsehoods he was promised! There was a time his & his government’s policies & behaviours would have led to civil unrest disobedience and the government being forced to resign or being arrested and charged with corruption and high treason!
My gut tells me that the City of London and its controlling hand want / need to get their paws on EU liquidity. Starmer's entire MO was to get us back in and agitate the Populus. Specifically the red wall's temerity for voting Brexit. Yookay a vassal under Von der Leyen. FFS.
Anyone know since when it’s been legal for dam foreign nationals to become Members of Parliament? Without the full Police check when British nationals who are genuine cannot
I expected things to be bad under Starmer’s Labour government and for them to become unpopular quickly. But I never thought it would be this bad this quickly. Yes he and Reeves are doing terrible damage to the economy. They talk a good game of encouraging economic growth but their policies of taxing business do the opposite. Even the 0.7% growth of Q1 is very shaky as the unadjusted GDP figures were negative. The Tories pulled a similar trick but it’s all pretty anaemic. Despite this I’m less worried about the economy as the markets won’t let them doe the damage Sunak as Chancellor during the pandemic and Truss as PM on energy subsidies did, thank God. I worry more about the lack of action on immigration as that’s the catalyst for all that’s wrong in the country from the economy to policing, to the courts and sentencing and social cohesion. Sort that out and the rest clicks into place.
Now this isn't as simple as it looks. In my own opinion, it would be definitely yes, he is working against the interests of the country, as I see it. That's the important bit.
I or anyone else can see inside Starmer's head, I know for a fact that I do not think in the same way as he does. In so doing im not going to arrive at the same conclusions.
If you don't start from the same place, it's unlikely you are going to arrive at the same destination.
I wasn't talking about subjective views. I meant is he actively working against British interests, knowingly - either due to blackmail or because he anyway wants to.
In contrast, I'd say even a hugely damaging leader like May wasn't. She was hopelessly misguided, on her Northern Ireland protocol, but that was idiocy, not deliberately to harm us.
Well again May I truly believe wanted the best for this country, but though equal measures of incompetence, bloody mindedness & ideology she totally lost the plot
I do believe that the down fall of the Tories started with May. But not when she was PM, much, much earlier in the Blair era when she coined the phase toxic Tories..... Cameron go in instead of David Davis & drove the Tories in to the arms of Limp Dems.
Personally I seriously do not like the man. I think with the sheer amount of lies that he has openly used he should be held in contempt of high office. But it isn't just the man it's the ideology that's just as much to blame.
I am totally shocked that Starmer has not been assassinated yet he certainly deserves it, if you are right about his own MP's asking questions about what the imbecile is doing it might be his fall will come sooner than later but they are a pretty cowed bunch of twerps if they have not been questioning his commitment to democracy which is 0.
Thanks Paul.
Symptoms of a failing government:-
*Corruption and lack of transparency-Lord Ali and the forty thieves
*Ineffective institutions-Courts, police, public institutions become unreliable and inaccessible-white hard working people jailed, non-white criminals freed
*Economic mismanagement-chronic budget deficit -£152 Billion for the current year, reliance on unsustainable debt with spiralling inflation up to 3.6%
*Erosion of rule of law-laws selectively applied and dissent suppressed by censorship and police state tactics
*Political instability-contested elections as in May 1st with 10 Councils captured by Reform
*Declining public services Infrastructure crumbling, NHS failing and education
standards being destroyed by Phillips. Power supply in danger of meltdown due to Net zero bollocks
*Loss of public trust-less than a third of people trust the government according to latest poll
*Human Rights abuses-crack down on free speech
*Brain drain and social decay-Billionaires and skilled people going, unskilled culturally backward people replacing leading to social cohesion fraying and crime and ethnic tensions rising.
Basically they're fucked and so are we.
Excellent summary Alan. Couldn’t agree more.
Cheers mate release the sausages !
And that’s the thing. For a so-called barrister, Starmer can’t even deliver a decent speech. Has to read everything and even then he makes it sound like he’s reading his Asda shopping list (including sausages).
Whereas Farage uses no notes of any kind BOOM !
Starmer's belief system was forged in the crucible of North London dinner parties. He's a zealot for that upper-middle-class, white-guilt-ridden, defeat-welcoming, left-liberal worldview. We, the people, don't count. Not at all. I'd say he despises us: our values, culture and history. His every decision proves it.
All true, but I still think additional pressure has been applied. The Chagos deal was on hold two weeks ago, but then suddenly got signed with great urgency.
It's not worth the toilet paper it's written on Paul, it needs to get through both houses and an Act of Parliament, it ain't going to happen !
Lower traitor class, you mean.
It has been said before that his father was a toolmaker and the biggest tool he made was Keir.
Damned straight, Paul.
Shortly after Starmer was elected, I concluded the guy's only intention was to utterly destroy Britain, deliberately appointing quarterwits like Lammy, and halfwits like wots-'er-name, that chick who worked for the bank. Wind 'em up, and let 'em go.
The only thing that concerns him is that he might be booted before he manages to do terminal damage - hence the comforting blah, blah about immigration and an island of strangers. An island of strangers is exactly what he intends.
Yes, to all that! But he's overreached, as have his controllers.
Turning a sovereign nation into a failed state is a risky business, it seems.
Indeed. And there are so many quarterwits, halfwits and dimwits.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/dim-and-dimmer-the-advanced-research?utm_source=publication-search
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/starmer-accused-of-echoing-far-right?utm_source=publication-search
I am really really hoping this is the fall of Rome moment. Treacherous doesn’t come close. If he doesn’t go soon I am gonna seriously think about claiming asylum in the US- until it is safe to return here😳. Anyone notice how ‘inconvenient’ truths disappear from MSM.
Anyone know how many have arrived from war torn France today? I heard they were refuse collectors back in France, before being driven to the coast and told Birmingham needs you🤔
People say the country is failing- but not everywhere I am really amazed too, how quick the police arrested AND charged some lad after they tried to assassinate our PM. Amazing efficiency.
Why worry - All is well. Think I’ll have a Chinese tonight- they are really good at long game cooking😉
The accumulation of events is gathering pace and starting to have unstoppable momentum.
Let’s hope so🤞🤞🤞
Indeed! However, I'm not sure Starmer "hates Britain" because that's just too easy isn't it? Possibly he is just really stupid and naive and thinks he is getting good deals because nobody he listens to tells him they are crap deals. It seems to me that the whole of the western world is being run by pretty stupid, naive and uneducated people and Starmer is merely one of the worst. At least some of the others are better at bullying each other into submission - Starmer seems to be the one it's easiest to bully. He is clearly not very intelligent and lacks both imagination and compassion. This makes him dangerous for the UK but would "our Ange" or "Mad Milliband" or "Rachel from Accounts" be any better? Was Boris Johnson or Richi Sunak any better? Is Chancellor Merz better than any German alternative or is there a better version of President Macron? They are all weak people who have, due to a lack of interest from strong people, crawled to the top of the political pile. We are clearly due the arrival of the strong men to return some order to the world!
Yes, there's an argument that democracy is ending. I think Starmer is additionally weak because he's being blackmailed.
Blackmailed? Ooh, The Ukrainian Boys! Lord Ali and the Clothes Allowance! Nose Dust with Zelensky!
If only we had The News of the World still!
Bureaucrats are completely unable to create anything, but they are able to punish those who don’t comply with their rules and regulations, and that’s what he’s doing deliberately and on behalf of the establishment.
Definitely, not necessarily for another government but the incompetent traitor has sold his soul to devil as they once said, turned his back on christianity for whatever falsehoods he was promised! There was a time his & his government’s policies & behaviours would have led to civil unrest disobedience and the government being forced to resign or being arrested and charged with corruption and high treason!
I think he's being blackmailed, though in the direction he'd anyway have gone.
Quite possibly but it’s still his own fault and ignorance, he chose to ignore the problems and create more inequality in this country.
These so called deals are not in the national interest and should be repealed by a Reform government
My gut tells me that the City of London and its controlling hand want / need to get their paws on EU liquidity. Starmer's entire MO was to get us back in and agitate the Populus. Specifically the red wall's temerity for voting Brexit. Yookay a vassal under Von der Leyen. FFS.
Anyone know since when it’s been legal for dam foreign nationals to become Members of Parliament? Without the full Police check when British nationals who are genuine cannot
No idea, I think it's more a case of dual nationals.
I expected things to be bad under Starmer’s Labour government and for them to become unpopular quickly. But I never thought it would be this bad this quickly. Yes he and Reeves are doing terrible damage to the economy. They talk a good game of encouraging economic growth but their policies of taxing business do the opposite. Even the 0.7% growth of Q1 is very shaky as the unadjusted GDP figures were negative. The Tories pulled a similar trick but it’s all pretty anaemic. Despite this I’m less worried about the economy as the markets won’t let them doe the damage Sunak as Chancellor during the pandemic and Truss as PM on energy subsidies did, thank God. I worry more about the lack of action on immigration as that’s the catalyst for all that’s wrong in the country from the economy to policing, to the courts and sentencing and social cohesion. Sort that out and the rest clicks into place.
"Is starmer actively working against Britain?"
Yes. Nearly 1 year on and look what he has achieved so far.
https://baldmichael.substack.com/p/keir-starmer-british-politician-and?utm_source=publication-search
P.S. I have seen an article heading suggesting most people in UK want to rejoin EU. I don't.
Now this isn't as simple as it looks. In my own opinion, it would be definitely yes, he is working against the interests of the country, as I see it. That's the important bit.
I or anyone else can see inside Starmer's head, I know for a fact that I do not think in the same way as he does. In so doing im not going to arrive at the same conclusions.
If you don't start from the same place, it's unlikely you are going to arrive at the same destination.
I wasn't talking about subjective views. I meant is he actively working against British interests, knowingly - either due to blackmail or because he anyway wants to.
In contrast, I'd say even a hugely damaging leader like May wasn't. She was hopelessly misguided, on her Northern Ireland protocol, but that was idiocy, not deliberately to harm us.
Well again May I truly believe wanted the best for this country, but though equal measures of incompetence, bloody mindedness & ideology she totally lost the plot
I do believe that the down fall of the Tories started with May. But not when she was PM, much, much earlier in the Blair era when she coined the phase toxic Tories..... Cameron go in instead of David Davis & drove the Tories in to the arms of Limp Dems.
Personally I seriously do not like the man. I think with the sheer amount of lies that he has openly used he should be held in contempt of high office. But it isn't just the man it's the ideology that's just as much to blame.
I am totally shocked that Starmer has not been assassinated yet he certainly deserves it, if you are right about his own MP's asking questions about what the imbecile is doing it might be his fall will come sooner than later but they are a pretty cowed bunch of twerps if they have not been questioning his commitment to democracy which is 0.