COVER-UP KEIR AT HIS FINEST

Keir Starmer was hiding behind bogus arguments on prejudicing trials, when he lied about speculation on the Southport killer’s motivation:

1. Why wasn't Starmer worried about prejudicing the trials of demonstrators, when he labelled them as ‘extreme right-wing criminal thugs’ and his DPP called them ‘terrorists’? This was before they’d appeared in court.

2. Why wasn't Home Secretary Yvette Cooper worried when she labelled those arrested as 'criminals', before they'd been tried? There was a Home Office poster using the word for everyone arrested.

3. Why were the numerous IRA attacks labelled as terrorist (as they were) before any trials? Were those who did so endangering the fight against the IRA? Then the entire media, political and security world did this.

4. How was Starmer not interfering in the judicial process when he said the Southport maniac wasn't a Muslim and didn't have a terrorist motivation? In any case, he was caught literally red-handed, standing over the slaughtered children. Is is seriously suggested that his trial would have collapsed because of speculation about him being a Muslim?

All of these questions have a simple answer: Britain operates under a two-tier judicial system, with Islamic terrorism and crimes committed by Muslims reported, investigated and tried very differently to those committed by non-Muslims, especially if they’re white, English and working class.

Because of this, Starmer and Cooper have tied themselves in knots and their fake inquiry isn’t needed, other than to provide them with cover. The ‘lessons we need to learn’ have been known since 610 AD, when Islam began. If we haven’t grasped them in over 1400 years, then bunging piles of public dosh at millionaire cronies of Starmer won’t provide further illumination. All we’ll get is more censorship, more excuses and more imprisonments, for those who point this out.